Decided
to listen to Gordon P. Firemark, Esq.’s Entertainment Law Podcast Update in
order to beef up on my intellectual and legal knowledge. During the podcast one case truly stood out. Although the entertainment podcast was riddled with juicy and informative legal
talk dealing with music licensing, video game combat helicopters, Velvet Underground vs Andy Warhol's Banana and copyright protection. However, it was the
discussion of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Golan v. Holder and the precedence it sets for future copyright
cases that raised my eyebrows. So I took it upon myself to brush up on this
case.
Intelektual Properties is a play and reflection on pseudo-calculated circumstances where a fashion brands success is based upon the choices of other fashion brands successes. Intelektual Prop follows and discusses fashion successes, follies, imitations, innovations, styles, trends and retail resurgences from a business standpoint. Essentially, what dictates a fashion brands staying power and why? Whether its couture or street fashion.
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Monday, March 5, 2012
Am I being infringed upon?
If
you have not read my previous blog post then you may not know that I have a certain
kind of disdain for trademark infringers, counterfeiters and bootleggers who purposefully copy and exploit another company’s brand without visually applying some kind of satiric artful
meaning behind their brand, a la Andy Warhol style.
Learning
the elements of trademark infringement and copyright laws is ever so important and given my own dreams and aspirations in fashion, entertainment and
law it behooves me to stay current on the rules and regulations that could hurt
my brand by creating a legal liability.
Ever
since the Lanham Act and Trademark
Counterfeiting Act of 1984 trademark infringement has been a useful
weapon in the fight against counterfeiters, counterfeiting channels and those
who choose to infringe upon or dilute another company's brand. There have been a few
seminal cases within the fashion industry in recent months that may affect my future
endeavors. Three examples of current trademark infringement court cases within
the apparel industry is the Navajo
Nation, The et al v. Urban Outfitters, Inc. et al, Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc., and Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent America.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Young Artists: French Montana, Says Lawyer Up!
As an artist in this day and technical age it is important
that you have some sort of leverage in order to protect your brand and pockets
from record companies. Too many young artists are taken advantage of
financially because they failed to read the contract that is presented in front
of them; they are too anxious to be signed.
Artists feel that this is a once in a lifetime deal, whether it is
signing with that record company or manager who claim they can make them a star
overnight. Next thing you know the
record company or even your manager owns everything you create. This is why I appreciate the business minded
the artist who recognizes their self-worth or who has enough patience,
foresight and intuition to secure a deal that is beneficial to him or her.
Labels:
Bad boy,
Debra Antney,
French Montana,
GOOD Music,
hip hop,
Kanye West,
Lawyer,
Legal,
Maybach Music,
Mizay Entertainment,
music,
New York,
publishing,
Real Talk,
Rick Ross,
Sean Diddy Combs,
Waka Flocka
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Pop Up Shops and Pop up Malls
Typically, when
a urban street wear apparel brand is starting up or even recently, establish couture brands, still
trying to keep it street and capture the essence of its the grassroots, they
proceed to open up a pop up shop. Hoping to make a name for themselves; add a
little hype to their growing brand, capture some foot traffic, get rid of
surplus inventory all to generate income. The concept of a pop up shop is
pretty cool if you ask me because if you do not know by now I am sale kind of
guy. A pop up shop is essentially clever
gorilla marketing at is best. However, a
pop up mall? That is the best thing since slice bread for a street wear sale
connoisseur such as myself.
Labels:
Boxpark,
cool,
evisu,
hype,
London,
mall,
pop up mall,
pop up shop,
Street Wear,
trademark,
trends,
UK,
vans,
yahoo
Monday, November 28, 2011
Urban Outfitters Is Slipping, Falling. But Can They Get Up?
So
I recently read Urban Outfitters (URBN.O) was a little down on its luck. According
to Bloomberg, their shares are down 27 percent this
year, the largest drop among U.S. specialty apparel retailers. Gasp! Will
URBN be able to rebound from their recent decline in sales? I personally believe they can if they do
these three little things. Hire new talent, collaborate, and stay clear of the
Ambercrombiesque type publicity (diversify). As Jezebel noted, their board
members are old, averaging around 50 and are predominately White men, who may be
slightly behind the trends I’m guessing, a pinch maybe. Let’s face it, URBN.O CEO Richard Hayne, is no longer hip or a hippie
nor is he an Urban Outfitter but a multi-billionaire, ‘mom and apple pie conservative’. The company is slowly reflecting their company president's political
affiliation. Urban Outfitter may be losing their cool. You're not cool if your
insensitive to Native Americans, steals designers' jewelry concepts, your boardroom is not diverse and you do not
support Gay rights. Miley Cyrus is not a fan.
Labels:
anthropologie,
bhldn,
bloomberg,
Fashion,
free people,
gay rights,
gilt,
Jackthreads,
jezebel,
karmaloop,
miley cyrus,
native american,
Reuters,
richard hayne,
shoplikekings,
terrain,
urban outfitters,
urbn
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Bootlegging the Zeitgeist
Labels:
AAFA,
artist,
bootleg,
How To Make It In America,
innovation,
intellectual property,
jean basquiat,
logo,
pablo picasso,
Project,
trademark,
U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
utilitarian,
Zeitgeist
Thursday, October 27, 2011
AAFA vs Counterfeiters
Piracy,
counterfeiting or bootlegging can be an annoying eyesore and headache in
fashion retailing. Growing up, working as a urban clothing sales associate or
as a sneaker head, urban fashionista or a plain old brand loyalist, I often
despised the consumer who participated in the purchasing of fake apparel because these consumers adamantly believe that the product that they were
wearing was not a fake. Sorry, but you have been hoodwinked and bamboozled. I
understand the feeling of wanting to belong or don the latest fashions. It
feels good to be in the ‘in crowd' sometimes, doesn’t it? However, I am not always a fan of the, 'fake it
till you make it' plan. In some regards, I am purest when it comes to fashion,
sneakers and style. If I can afford brand, I will purchase the brand. If I
cannot afford it then I can wait till I can afford it but never will I wear
pirated or counterfeit shoes or apparel because I can be a clothing snob or brand slave at times. Not to mention, I may be fooling others but I am not fooling myself.
To assist apparel and footwear companies in fighting the good fight against counterfeiters, the
American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA), provides members and visitors
a like with an anti-counterfeiting coalition issue tool kit. In conjunction
with the Coalition Against Counterfeiting and Piracy (CACP) of which AAFA is an
active member, released recommended steps companies can use in order to protect
their supply chains from counterfeiters. As mentioned on AAFA’s webpage, CACP
partnered with U.S. Chamber of Commerce and provided companies with a tool kit
that, “[C]ontains best practice[sic] guidelines and seven case studies of
companies that devised and implemented aggressive techniques to fight
counterfeiting and piracy and protects themselves and their customers”.
Labels:
AAFA,
bootleg,
Brand Protection Council,
CACP,
Counterfeiters,
Ed Haddad,
fake,
Fashion,
Fraud,
New Balance,
Sneaker Heads,
Street Wear,
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Location:
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
